leadingtoday.org
Copyright 2002 ã weLEAD, Inc.
For decades it was
incorrectly believed by many people that all great leaders possessed a trait
called charisma. This influential trait is defined as “those who
arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm”. It
typically includes a strong personal magnetism or charm. Unfortunately, far too many people have actually defined
leadership as if it was synonymous with charisma! Many military generals, business
mavericks and athletic coaches have been quoted extensively to promote a
“winning is everything” or the “only thing” approach to achievement or problem
solving. No doubt that talented individuals like Vince Lombardi and General
George S. Patton had charisma and some valuable leadership skills. It is true
that when used effectively charisma can be a powerful motivating tool by
those leaders who possess it. But this does not prove an exclusive link
between leadership and charisma. In actuality, the majority of leaders who have
ever existed or exist today do not have charisma. The reason is because
it is not essential for leadership.
Sadly
some individuals who have the gift of charisma have misused this tool to
manipulate and deceive followers to achieve personal gain or power. This has
been a common problem throughout human history. Recent news reports about
political and business corruption highlights how certain individuals have
misused their power of persuasion to abuse others for selfish personal gain.
As
a society, our focus should not be on those who have charisma but rather on
those who lead with integrity. Author Jim Collins comments in his book Good To Great: Why Some Companies Make the
Leap…and Others Don’t (HarperCollins) that the
difference between a good leader and a bad one is “the inner landscape of the
leader”. He spent five years studying business leaders who took their companies
from good to great by maintaining outstanding performance for at least 15
years. His conclusion is that the good leaders were “ambitious first and
foremost for their cause, for the company, for the work. Not for themselves.
They are self-confident, not self-centered”.
Did
Collins find that charisma was an essential or even important trait for a good
leader? To the contrary he found that these leaders were “self-effacing, quiet,
reserved, even shy – these leaders are a paradoxical blend of personality,
humility and professional will. They are more like Lincoln and Socrates than
Patton or Caesar”. It is a common
cultural flaw to expect leaders to exhibit charisma or to closely link
leadership with charisma. This flaw has led many down a path of frustration and
disillusionment when the personal charisma of a leader proved to be
self-absorbed and shallow.
Instead
of charisma, our culture should focus on possessing leadership qualities like
being trustworthy, genuine, honest and service-minded. These are the traits
that reveal the “inner landscape of the leader” and provide a long-term
motivation for others to follow.
For weLEAD, this is Greg Thomas reminding you that it was
Confucius who said, “Humility is the solid foundation
of all the virtues”.
Back to weLEAD Home Page