leadingtoday.org
Copyright 2002 ã weLEAD, Inc.

Perhaps one major quality that defines leadership is the ability to get
things done. The bottom line of attaining real accomplishment is
understanding that mere activity isn't
achievement. Attaining the right results is
achievement! Many leaders have the fatal problem of analysis
paralysis. It is often demonstrated by constant requests for more statistics,
reports, studies, evaluations and meetings. This process is usually accompanied
by little real decision-making because more
"study“ or "research“ always needs to be done! The myth involved with an analysis paralysis mind-set is that mere activity
is equated with achievement.
It is
certainly true that leaders must search
for valid information to make sound judgements. It is also true that effective
leadership uses various analytical skills to sort
facts from assumptions in the decision-making process. Yes, wise leaders do
establish and monitor valuable processes to analyze important feedback on the results of past decisions and actions. The
difference is that analysis paralysis struggles to get beyond
proposals, systems, reports and meetings to really accomplish anything
substantial. This may be due to many reasons, including the fear of failure among the management team members. Many
years ago I worked for a small family-owned business that struggled seriously
with this problem. Day after day was filled with meetings, more talk, analysis,
surveys, strategy sessions, and finally inaction.
One of the family members had a plaque in his office that aptly read, “When all
is said and done...much more will be said
than is ever done!“ Many consultants look back
after the demise of organizations and realize that failure was often
accelerated not by the decisions that were made, but by the decisions it failed
to make at critical times.
Here
are some ways to guard against analysis paralysis...
1. Set
deadlines on projects and
major decisions. Everyone in the organization should understand that a time
limitation exists for the decision-making process of a project. Only during
rare situations should the deadline be extended. These situations would include
a sudden change in market or competitive environments that may legitimately be
cause for reevaluation. If potential
decisions are allowed to be openended without an established deadline, odds are
that the tough decisions will be avoided!
2. Evaluate
the locus of control of your
entire management team. You may be in for a shock
and it may provide an answer to a large part of the problem of analysis
paralysis. Your locus of control is a
trait measured by a personality scale orginally developed by Julian Rotter.
Most individuals have a tendency to have either a strong internal
locus of control orientation or strong external
locus of control orientation. Those with a strong internal
locus of control believe most events that occur in their
lives are determined by their own actions rather than by chance. In contrast,
those with a strong external locus
of control believe most events occur by chance or circumstance and conclude
they have little control over fate, or to change their lives. Those with an internal orientation tend to accept more responsibility for
their actions and for organizational performance. Research indicates that those
with a strong internal locus of
control are also more flexible, innovative, adaptive and take more initiative in solving problems. What is your locus of control
orientation? Perhaps a large part of your management team have an external locus of control. Or, perhaps they are simply
following your example! You can find out more about this trait measurement at http://www.dushkin.com/connectext/psy/ch11/survey11.mhtml
3. If
you believe you have a problem, compensate
by getting help. Effective leaders acknowledge they have weaknesses and learn to
rely on competent associates or peers who have the strengths they lack. Ask
this associate to confidentially come to you and alert
you to the tendency of analysis paralysis when it becomes evident to them. Part
of the solution to this problem is recognizing
the weakness in yourself or your
team and taking the necessary steps to modify or change behavior.
For weLEAD, this is Greg Thomas
reminding you that it was General George C. Marshall who said, “Don’t fight the problem; decide it.”
Back to weLEAD Home Page