leadingtoday.org
Copyright 2005 ă weLEAD, Inc.
Lying deep within the
cultural history of mankind is the belief in, and a desire for a heroic
leader! Our ancient ancestors left a rural society as nomadic hunters and
formed city-states around 3500 B.C. Within these small villages a single leader
usually emerged to become a ruler. Sometimes for the good of the group, but
often for the bad, this leader struggled to maintain power mostly with the
intent of making “rulership” a family-owned business.
As we enter the 21st century, things have changed very little in our
diverse and technological world. Even in democratic nations our culture still
fosters a mythology of the heroic leader. In the United States, a very popular
television program now hosts prominent corporate leaders supposedly mentoring
their younger interns. The climax of the show is when the interns are told by
the heroic business leader, “you’re
fired”!
Heroic
leaders are viewed as almost romantic characters who single-handedly determine
the fate of their organizations. Our culture is a reflection of this history
from the secret agent who saves the world from nuclear destruction, to the lone
cowboy who saves the town from evil outlaws. During times of war, even democratic nations consolidate more
power into the hands of a single individual in a belief that the heroic leader
will save the day.
The
truth is that people usually exaggerate the importance of leaders to explain
events in a way that fits with their assumptions or fears. It is difficult to
explain random events such as uncontrollable forces of nature, supernatural
phenomenon or unexpected catastrophe. Looking to a single heroic leader makes
it easier to explain positive and negative events by attributing them to
individual actions of a person. It helps us make sense out of events that are
otherwise incomprehensible. This is a mistake because all leaders are human and
have personal flaws. Idolizing any heroic leader will eventually lead to disappointment as their humanity and weaknesses
become obvious.
For
example, there is no doubt that Winston Churchill was a strong courageous
leader for the British nation during the horrors of the 2nd World
War. He is often looked upon as a heroic leader. Yet, anyone who studies
history can easily point to a few poor decisions he made that needlessly cost
the lives of thousands of solders and innocent civilians. He was indeed the
right man for the right time. But in reality
the war was won because of the sacrifice and dedication of many and not
because of a single heroic leader. Perhaps Britain would not have won the war
without Churchill, but it certainly would
not have won the war without the sacrifice of her young pilots flying their Spitfires above the skies of Britain!
The
leadership tip for this month is to
have a balanced perspective about
heroic leaders. The mythology of a heroic leader is that they are expected to
be wiser and more courageous than any one else. They are supposed to know
everything going on around them. This is simply unrealistic and it is
impossible for anyone to live up to this standard. It is true that some
individuals have the skills and personality to galvanize everyone around them
to a common cause. But leadership is always a shared quality, even though most of the unsung heroes are never
recognized. In most cases, the greatest sacrifice is not made by the heroic
leader… but by others. Be careful not to exaggerate the strengths or weaknesses
of a heroic leader. Appreciate the contribution and skills they used to achieve
their mission. But, don’t make the mistake of setting them on a pedestal as an
idol of a certain cause. Don’t diminish the significant contribution of their
colleagues and followers. As John Maxwell has written, “If you think you are
leading and no one is following, you are only taking a walk.”
In
the last two hundred years our governments, workplaces and families have
changed dramatically. We can argue about whether these changes are good or bad.
But, one thing is for sure! The mythology of the single heroic leader is
ending. Yes, it is true that during times of war or sudden catastrophe we may
always need a courageous single
leader to guide us during the storm. But more than ever, leadership must be shared for our institutions to thrive
and fulfill their purpose. We all must accept our responsibility to lead where
and when we can. As followers we must also have leadership skills and lead upward when the person over us
lacks certain talents that we have. The idea that leadership is exclusively from the “top… down” is
obsolete. Leadership must now permeate
an organization at every level for it to reach its potential, and everyone must
be recognized for their contribution.
For
weLEAD, this is Greg Thomas
reminding you that Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “In times of peace the people
look most to their representatives; but in war, to the executive solely”.