weLEAD Online Magazine
Copyright
2005 ã weLEAD, Inc.
Fostering organizational learning
and leadership is important and relevant work.
Fortunately, opportunities abound to explore theories and present research
aimed at increasing organizational capacity.
Several prominent thinkers have emerged in recent times who have
contributed to reforming historical thinking about organizational life. Such work is extremely helpful as tumultuous
economic conditions, evolving societal expectations and emerging political
platforms have fundamentally changed the familiar in organizational life. The necessity of rethinking proverbial
approaches has implications for organizational effectiveness and long-term
survival. In this shifting environment,
common organizational structures, cultures, and traditions may be seen as
impediments to success and in need of re-engineering.
One
powerful idea supported by weLEAD, the concept of servant leadership, is
well-chosen in this regard.
Organizations can benefit from the thoughtful application of servant
leadership, as it adds value to organizational cultures by increasing focus on
the intrinsic issues of human dynamics.
If chosen and used correctly, it can repackage thinking about how
informal and formal power is used, how people relate and work together, and
what is valued in organizations.
Articulated
by Robert Greenleaf (1904-1990) as a taxonomy of
learning for people and organizations, servant leadership is described by behaviors
that are in great contrast to those in organizational cultures based on
traditional hierarchical structures and uses of power. Those behaviors are listed by Larry Spears as good listening, empathy, healing,
awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to
growth and building community.1
Servant
leadership is a concept that is greatly distinguished from management. Management behaviors of controlling, guiding,
heading, and directing others are based on notions of organizational goals and
are end product-focused. They include
the functions of supervision, instruction and decision making. Management functions are important in
organizations, but when approaches that are servant leadership-based are used,
a principled focus emerges, one that is concerned with process and
product. Simply put, servant leadership
is based on service to others, based in systems thinking, and based in
community. Servant leadership functions
include developing shared vision, encouraging innovation, taking risks, seeking
opportunities to enhance the development of others, utilizing foresight, and
applying systems thinking when solving problems.
If
understood and applied correctly, this concept can revolutionize social
architecture and power structures in organizations, for it considers the
priority needs of others first. Servant
leadership requires a focused, authentic leadership style. Such leaders are deliberately committed to
positive change and building community in order to identify and solve
problems. These leaders understand the
power of symbols and are not afraid to flaunt a commitment to effective
leadership through impactful actions. Servant leadership equips organizations to
anticipate and respond to the future by taking a strategic approach that
strives to disperse power and the locus of control through purposeful
participative approaches.
When
Greenleaf conceptualized servant leadership, he outlined a learning process as, “It begins with the natural feeling
that one wants to serve, to serve first.
Then conscious choice brings one to aspire to lead.”2 Described here as a self-managed
developmental process, it begins with intrinsic motivations, reaches into
cognition and is expressed extrinsically as service first, then leadership. Based on this taxonomy, the abilities to
think critically and choose deliberately appear to be the only pre-requisites
for servant leadership. Servant
leadership, it can be argued, is a simple, yet elegant solution for enhancing
organizational life. Servant leadership
focuses on private intentions, personal reflections and public actions, and
requires that these three components remain connected in organizational
culture.
As the new
editor of the E-Journal of Organizational
Learning and Leadership, I recognize the work of the founding editor, Dr.
References:
1Spears, L. [Editor] (1998). Insights on leadership. (pp. 3-6).
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2 Greenleaf,
R. (1977). Servant Leadership: A journey into legitimate power
and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Comments
to: flumerfe@leadingtoday.org
About the
author: