weLEAD Online Magazine
Copyright
2004 ã weLEAD, Inc.
To encourage
positive forces within an organization, leaders should implement the universal
law of movement: motivate, direct and make sure there is structure to serve the
former two.
One of the greatest challenges
that the corporate leader, or any leader for that matter, faces is negativity.
So many variables impact
their followers on a daily basis that it becomes increasingly
difficult for them to remain positive. Furthermore, from many interviews with
MDs and CEOs in South Africa, it seems that there may be even more variables in
the South African environment impacting on the corporate employee’s attitude
than was previously thought.
Negativity of your followers has a
huge impact on your success as a leader. You may have the ability to rise above
the negativity, and therefore assume that those all around you can and should
do the same. Do not make this mistake.
Ladragh Cozens,
CEO, Cozens Recruitment, says: “I think that negativity does draw, and people
do get embroiled in, the negative aspect of communication. I think it is a fine
human being that can stand above the negative energies that are there, and can
actually float within the positive.”
We call this fine human being a
“Profitable Leader”. Rarely are people taught how to overcome negativity, yet
often leaders manage to do so themselves, and great leaders often manage to do
so with others.
Negativity creates an environment
that is the exact opposite of passion, energy, commitment, accountability and,
above all, high motivation. Ask yourself how many of your staff have a passion
for the business they are in. How many of them accidentally landed inside your organization, and simply
work to pay the bills at the end of the month? If every one of your employees
were asked what career they would follow if they had their life over again, how
many would want to be in a different place, career or job?
The truth is that few of your
employees are actually passionately following their aspirations. Add to this
factors such as mergers, acquisitions, retrenchments, change in leadership,
legislative requirements or injustices of the past. As a leader who wants and
needs a positive, motivated workforce, you therefore start with a drawback.
Compare this majority of your
workforce with the minority who passionately want to be there. They are
typically the ones who are motivated, who take ownership, who have energy, who
are committed to the business and your direction as a leader, who come up with
innovative ideas to improve.
The truth is that when one is not
following one’s aspirations, and therefore not naturally highly motivated, it
is much easier to be drawn to the negative pole, view or perception of a given
situation; to seek and find other variables that can be blamed for a negative
attitude. Negativity is the enemy of optimal performance.
How do you as a leader ensure that
your “minority” remains positive and motivated? How do you as a leader get the
“majority” of your people to be positive? How do you get them into passionate
mode?
The greatest way to combat the
challenge of negativity, and other challenges, is to refine your leadership
capability continually. If negativity is on the increase, then so too should be
your ability to combat it as a leader.
Roy Andersen, CEO, Liberty Group,
explains: “To me, the key requirement of a leader is to ensure that the vision is
set, and that people are motivated to achieve that vision. That’s your job
description ...
“Now, sometimes you don’t have the
people around you to do that, so one of the things you have to do is divert
into structure to get the right people, and come back again, and thereafter
steer the new team to the vision. My role is to ensure the vision is set, and
that people are motivated and committed to it.”
Ted Woods, recently retired CEO of
Deutsche Bank, said the following about leadership: “Well, a door [to become
CEO] opened, and I had a look through the door. I knew that the job involved
two big things. The one was to motivate the people you led, and the other was
to build a strategy that was rational and likely to succeed. So, these were the
dual thrusts to the new job — having a look at two things: people and
strategy.”
Both Andersen and Woods are
seasoned leaders, yet I wonder if they realize just how right they are. During
many qualitative interviews and coaching sessions with leaders, we at Moditure, a consultancy that develops profitable
leadership, have come to the conclusion that it is easy to confuse yourself on
this critical topic.
Just browse through your local
bookstore and try to decide which book on leadership you should invest in.
There are so many from which to choose.
We maintain that leadership is
simple if you look at, and understand, the golden thread of universal
principles that underpin most leadership models. It need not be complex.
Leaders are in the business of
“movement”. It is required of the leader to move others from point A to point
B, wherever it may be. Cozens says about leadership: “I think leaders go into
action, and they are not afraid to go into action.”
Frik Vermaak, CEO, Computershare,
explains: “A leader is probably the central figure that would pull along, or
push along, people towards a common goal.”
These statements indicate movement
by their very nature. Vermaak explains further that
he sees “push” in a positive sense, where you encourage people to get there
themselves, and “pull along” sometimes means you have to get them to break
their own mold and get over those
initial fears of change.
“Once they have grasped what the
new vision or thoughts are about, they actually go down that path quite
comfortably.”
If the leader is at the head of an
organization, certain stakeholders expect him or her to move the organization
to greater profitability. Growth (movement) is expected. Change (movement) must
occur. The organization cannot stand still or remain stagnant, and neither can
the people.
How does this impact on your role
as the leader? Understand that there is a universal law that states the
following: “All movement in life is governed by integration of motivation,
direction and structure.”
Nothing in life moves without some
motive, or something motivating it, to move. Test this universal truth on
yourself. You yourself need a motive (reason) to move, and if you are
passionately committed to the motive, you will move with energy, commitment,
dedication and absolute accountability.
Every single day of your life you
are driven by motives that are strong enough to move you. You get out of bed
for a reason. That reason (motive) could simply be that you have to go to work
in order to have the means to pay the bills, or it could be that you want to go
out there and make a difference in people’s lives, resulting in higher
motivation.
We have found that the greatest
challenge of a leader lies in the motivation step of the universal law of
movement, and we believe it is the most important one. The ability to motivate
is an important weapon in the combat against negativity.
Andersen says: “I find that if you
come up with a vision that is clear and exciting, people actually want that
leadership. What motivates them is clarity of vision, and being part of a
team.”
What makes a vision clear? It
helps to understand the reason, purpose and motivation behind the vision.
Explain what your aspirations behind the vision are. It gives followers the
opportunity to integrate with your desires and aspirations, which really is the
driving force behind the direction.
If you don’t give them a motive or
purpose that is exciting, or even plain urgent, they will simply go into the
direction because you tell them to do it. This means passion, energy,
dedication, commitment and accountability will be lacking.
And how does one feel part of a
team? When one’s aspirations are integrated with the other members of the team,
and the team as a whole. The profitable leader generates aspirations that at
least the majority of the followers want to integrate with.
This does not necessarily mean a
common vision, but a common driving reason and motivation for the vision.
People have a universal need to know why they must do something, or move
somewhere.
Cozens explains:
“There has got to be a basic need that matches the leader to the follower.
There has got to be a meeting of needs between the leader and the followers.
“There has got to be an ability
where the leader and the followers satisfy each other’s needs, and once they
satisfy each other’s needs, it’s easy for the leader to pull forward, and for
the followers to get into gear and motivate themselves into the direction that
the leader wants them to follow.”
Bill Sears, MD, Dairymaid-Nestlé, is driving a project known as “Tirisanani”,
which is Tsonga for pulling or working together: teamwork. It encourages
involvement, identifying problems and solutions together, in an environment
where people are free to challenge.
They are developing a culture of
“Aspiration Integration”, which will add to high motivation levels. I would
back such an organization.
Referring to Vermaak’s
earlier statement of a “common goal” — what more is a common goal than
aspiration integration?
Woods says: “When people really
believe, through your actions, that you are trying to
create the win for them, plus, the vision or business model that you explained
to them appeals to their logic, they are behind you.”
This statement confirms the
importance of making sure there is integration of the motives or aspirations
(“create the win”), and purpose for having to move (“appeals to their logic”).
Kevin Wakeford,
the former CEO of the South African Chamber of Business, says: “A good leader who
understands will connect with the heart — not the mind — of the customer base,
the heart of the employee.
“The biggest problem is that we
provide people with the tools of management, and not the imperatives of
leadership.
“An MBA is certainly not the whole
answer. It provides the tools, and everybody needs tools, but everyone needs to
know why they are doing something, for what purpose, and what their role in
that context is, and what informs them and drives them.”
Most of your staff members have
never learned the art of generating positive aspirations, and then following
them. They don’t really know what passionately motivates them, yet following
aspirations that you really believe in is what actually motivates.
Your job as a leader is to show as
many of your employees as possible that your motive behind the direction that
the company is following, or will follow, will benefit them greatly. This leads
to buy-in, which creates high motivation.
Having a clear motive, and being
committed to it, is not enough. You need to know what direction to steer that
energy into. Energy without direction can actually be dangerous.
Andersen says: “If you’ve got a
common vision, you will land up in the right place. How you get there is
sometimes the challenge. If the vision is clear, everybody knows where the
target is. So, how do you get the buy-in at the bottom?
“Through
communication, communication, communication, and then by the alignment of the incentivisation with the desired goal. You can
never over-communicate, particularly in stressful situations like mergers or
takeovers.”
Communication is the integration
process. Make sure, however, that you not only communicate the vision
(direction), but that you motivate the reason for it, as well as how
integrating with it would benefit every employee.
Wakeford also
commented about a leader: “It’s that person who is probably most connected to
his or her values, and who says, ‘This is the direction we are taking.’ No-one
else knows quite what to do. They are not really connected to the degree that
they are willing to chart a course.”
A leader must be absolutely sure
of what his personal aspirations, desires and motives are. He must be sure what
in life, or in a specific situation, he values most. Such a person draws followers.
All of us feel secure when the leader has confidence in the motive, purpose and
reason for following a specific direction.
If followers buy into the
motivation behind the direction, you as a leader will be able to uphold
“Directional Integrity”. This simply means you and your followers feel the
direction is an honest one, the right one to follow. The motives behind it are
clear. There is openness in the air, which means it is a part of the culture.
Now, looking back at the universal
law of movement, structure comes into the picture. You have a motive to get out
of bed in the morning. You know what your direction to the office is, but how
will you get there? What do you need to realize or give substance to your
motivation and direction?
You will probably use your vehicle
as a structure (resource) to actually “move”. The reason (motive) and the
direction come to nothing if you have no means at all to get to the office. You
need something tangible that will serve your direction and motive. If you don’t
have transport, or if your vehicle breaks down, then the structure obviously
does not serve you.
Once again, Andersen’s first
statement sustains the universal law. He mentions that there are times that the
leader must divert back to structure and make sure things are in place, before
he can steer the organization back on course.
Vermaak says you
have to look at the big picture “way beyond the company, perhaps even in an
international context, and then bring that home and structure the company
around what the possible needs are”. In other words, make sure the structure
serves the direction and motivation.
I asked Andersen how the leader
gets structure to integrate with direction and motivation. “I think there is no
magic formula. Obviously you design the structure after you’ve got the
strategy. You’ve got to keep continually challenging it.
“The first thing I did when I got
to Liberty was to stop the regular meetings of various committees for two
months, and then got everybody together again and said, OK what did we really
miss? Which meetings were critical? Which were just excuses for people to make
collective decisions and not accept responsibilities for their real jobs?
“I would say we kept 60 percent,
but we dropped 40 percent. In our organization we try to cut the bureaucracy,
and ask ourselves whether we really need these levels of controls.”
What he was doing was making sure
the structure serves the leaders, and not the other way around. In other words,
as a true profitable leader he fights bureaucracy.
So, what is the role of a leader?
Your role is to aim not only to be a leader, but to become and remain a
profitable leader who continually strives to simplify things in a world where
complexity seems to take over.
I asked Cozens whether or not
leadership is complex. “I think it is actually simple. I think people make it
complex, but I don’t think leaders are complex. I think that leaders have got a
simple way of cutting to the thrust of the situation. That’s what makes them
different.”
She is so right. As a profitable
leader you have to simplify things. See yourself as a “mover and shaker”. You
have to move yourself, employees, employee attitudes and the organization to
greater heights. You therefore have to implement the universal law of movement.
You have to motivate, direct and make sure there is structure to serve the
former two.
Profitable leaders adopt an
integrative style in the process of arriving at the universal components of
movement. Alan Woolfson (MD, Charter Life Insurance)
explains a motive (reason) behind being an integrative leader well: “You know
if you are a leader who is right 80 percent of the time, you can afford to be a
dictatorial leader. The fact that it would be hard to retain bright people
working under these circumstances is an issue, but most of the decisions made
would be right.
“But with the incredible
complexity of our work environment, a leader’s decisions would probably be
right about 50 percent of the time. So, you can up that percentage by getting
input from other people. The main thing is to get as much input as possible
before making a decision, pushing up your ‘hit rate’ as high as possible.”
Russell Loubser,
CEO, JSE Securities Exchange, is a positive and motivated person who believes a
leader gets 100 percent output from his people when they run with an idea they
feel they themselves manufactured substantially. The alternative is that they
implement his idea only because they are told to do so. Such an approach, he
says, leads to a reactive rather than a proactive culture.
The integrative (profitable)
leader will achieve a healthy “report card” (balance sheet) at the end of the
financial year. However, to get there he or she will make sure that
relationships with all other stakeholders are moving profitably in the process.
In other words, employees will
feel that they are benefiting or gaining from the movement. The clients or
customers will feel that they too are benefiting.
The profitable leader will ensure he
and the organization have a motivated relationship with each stakeholder by
integrating aspirations.
From such a position, it will be
far easier to ensure that direction is integrated, and also that the structures
that will ensure movement are integrated. If
not, the
relationship with a specific stakeholder will not be profitable, and therefore
movement will be hindered.
Remember that people who stagnate will become negative.
People who do not grow will become negative. People who do not change will become
negative.
In essence, people who do not move profitably become negative. Your
saving grace as a leader is to refine the skills necessary to move your
followers profitably.
Comments
to: editor@leadingtoday.org
BACK TO weLEAD HOME PAGE
About
the author:
Adriaan Groenewald
is managing director of Moditure and Co-author of the
CEO Leadership Handbook.
The Moditure methodology for transferring profitable leadership
skills is focused on the aspirations of the leader.
Moditure provide services in four areas:
1.Augmented coaching of the leader and top executives
2.Fostering a profitable leadership culture in the organization
3.Attitude management
4.Aspiration Integration of teams
You
can check out their site http://www.moditure.co.za
Or purchase the CEO Leadership Handbook from www.ceoleadershiphandbook.com