weLEAD Online Magazine

leadingtoday.org

Copyright 2004 ã weLEAD, Inc.

 

 

Leadership: Why is it Necessary? – Part 1

 

By Cicily Goreham

 

 

In the new age of technology and auto-answer phone systems, it is much more difficult to communicate with others.  As a society, we have become more familiar with communication through typing and Instant Messaging shorthand and are challenged with maintaining face-to-face communication skills.  Therefore, it is important, more than ever, that positive, effective leadership is demonstrated and practiced in the workplace.  In order for people to become more successful with interpersonal communication, it is necessary for them to learn how to be effective leaders.  In this article, I will attempt to convey the importance leadership has upon management, including mentoring, training, mutual respect, and how archetypes can be used to predetermine leadership styles.

 

            First, leadership must be defined.  Dessler (2004) defined leadership as “one person influencing another to willingly work toward a predetermined objective” (p. 503). Dessler continued to identify leadership as the third basic function of the management process, stating it was used as an “umbrella term to cover all or most of the behavioral things managers do, like motivation, communication, groups, conflict, and change” (p. 255).

 

Coulter (2002) defined strategic leadership as “an individual’s ability to anticipate, envision, maintain flexibility, think strategically, and work with others in the organization to initiate changes that will create a viable and valuable future for the organization” (p. 20).  Weiss (2003) indicated that the top leaders’ “values model behaviors for others in the organization” (p. 327).

 

Montesino (2003) reiterated the definition of leadership by Greenberg and Baron (1997) as “the process whereby one individual influences other group members toward the attainment of defined group or organizational goals” and that “followership is seen as the reciprocal of leadership” (n.p.).  Therefore, leadership encompasses, or has the potential to encompass, every transaction, negotiation, navigation, and is somewhat of the essence of an organization.

 

            Weiss (2003) stated that “effective and ethical leaders develop a collaborative approach to setting direction, leading top-level teams, and building relationships with strategic alliance partners and customers” (p. 119).  Moore (2003) illustrates the necessity of leadership:

 

“I tend to invite folks who other employees are drawn towards.  They represent a type of "heliotropic leadership" in the rugged jungle of business life.  They radiate a natural luminescence that coworkers gravitate towards and are nurtured by.  With these folks around, corporate toxicity is keep to a minimum and a form of workplace photosynthesis takes place” (n.p.).

 

 

            PewPartnership (2002) states “leadership is one of the indisputable ingredients of successful communities, large and small” (n.p.).  Bisoux (2002) reiterates Posner in stating, “you can’t be an effective manager these days without being an effective leader.  There’s too much complexity, too much turbulence to simply ‘manage’” (p. 31).

 

The necessity of leadership in the workplace is to create an environment that is positive for fostering relationships and conducive to effective production.  Without effective leadership, the process would falter and the organization would suffer loss, either monetary, personnel, or production.

 

Continuing with the idea that effective leaders build relationships with customers and coworkers, it is imperative that they possess certain traits that accompany leadership success.  Traits are defined by Dessler (2004) as “the unchanging characteristics of a person that predisposes someone in a particular way” (p. 256).

           

According to Shapiro (1999), the most important skill for network marketing success is listening. He states “no matter how successful you become, or how high you rise in your organization, you must build your business one person at a time.  To do that, you must make a personal connection with people, a connection so powerful that it overcomes their natural resistance to change, to try something new, to leave their comfort zone.  And the strongest link in the chain that connects people is the skill of listening” (pp. 2-3). 

 

Listening is a fundamental trait for leaders to possess.  In order to begin to build a stable interpersonal relationship, the leader and the subordinate must be able to listen to one another.  They must feel that their opinions are heard and considered.  If that does not happen, the relationship will most likely falter.  As Shapiro (1999) stated, “Simply put, the most successful and influential people in all walks of life tend to be the best listeners” (p. 3).

 

            Robbins (2003) identified six traits in which leaders tend to differ from nonleaders.  These traits include ambition and energy, the desire to lead, honesty and integrity, self-confidence, intelligence, and job-relevant knowledge (p. 315). Ambition and energy personify the leader’s drive to get the job done, the willingness to set an example and maintain high standards for themselves.  Leaders must possess a desire, or yearning, to lead others.  If a person does not wish to lead others, the lack of enthusiasm will emanate to his, or her, followers and the task to be accomplished will be jeopardized.  In order for a leader to build the necessary relationships, he, or she, must be trustworthy.  The people they are building a rapport with must believe they are dealing with an honest person with integrity.  If this trust cannot be established, there is only an illusion of a relationship and no real leadership role can be established.  A leader must be confident in himself, or herself, before others can have a level of confidence in him.  Intelligence is an important factor in any relationship.  Furthermore, a leader must have knowledge of the organizational goals and products.  A prospective leader will lose followers if he displays ongoing ignorance about the task at hand.

 

            To embellish upon Robbin’s leadership traits, Dessler (2004) identified the Big 5 Traits, which he deemed as the foundations to personality.  In order for a person to be a true, effective leader, he should have some level of extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness and must be open to experiences (p. 257).

 

Some leaders happen to be managers.  Whetton & Cameron (2002) suggested:

“In order to be an effective manager…individuals must be competent in (1) clan skills, (2) adhocracy skills, (3) market skills, and (4) hierarchy skills.

Clan skills include those required to build effective interpersonal relationships and develop others.  Adhocracy skills include those required to manage the future, innovate, and promote change.  Market skills include those required to compete effectively and manage external relationships.  Hierarchy skills include those required to maintain control and stability” (p. 15).

 

The United States Small Business Administration (n.d.) identifies Raymond Cattell as a pioneer in the field of personality assessment and lists his Leadership Potential equation. Cattell’s Leadership Potential equation is used to determine the traits that characterize an effective leader.  Cattell’s Potential equation includes emotional stability, they must by psychologically mature and be capable of dealing with a plethora of situations; dominance, they must be competitive and assertive when dealing with others; enthusiasm, they must be active, expressive, and energetic, optimistic and open to change; conscientiousness, they must possess a sense of duty; social boldness, they are usually spontaneous risk-takers and tough-skinned; tough-mindedness, they tend to be practical, logical and to-the-point and are comfortable with criticism; self-assurance, possessing self-confidence and resiliency; and compulsiveness, typically, they are controlled and precise in their social interactions (n.p.).

 

            Clark (2997) identifies the U.S. Army’s 23 Traits of Character as bearing, confidence, courage, integrity, decisiveness, justice, endurance, tact, initiative, coolness, maturity, improvement, will, assertiveness, candor, sense of humor, competence, commitment, creativity, self-discipline, humility, flexibility, empathy, and compassion (n.p.).

 

            The same ideals for leadership surface, time after time.  The necessity for good leadership is that the leader be respectful, organized, passionate about the tasks at hand, and that they are dedicated to motivating others.

 

            Now that basics of leadership have been identified, the aspects of leadership pertaining to mentorship can be discussed.  Whetton & Cameron (2002) state that studies have shown that career success, work satisfaction, and resiliency to stress are enhanced by a mentoring relationship.  Furthermore, they describe a mentoring relationship as one in which “individuals need someone else in the organization that can provide a role model, from whom they can learn, and from whom they can receive attention and reinforcement of self-worth, especially under certain, crucial, and stressful situations” (p. 135).  Therefore, a mentor is more than an on-the-job trainer. 

 

Another job of a mentor is listening.  Shapiro (1999) states “we must temporarily suspend our judgments, and allow ourselves to be fully present for the other person” (p. 11). Shapiro (1999) continues with “Listening is the key that opens the door to human motivation” (p. 12), hence, a mentor is a motivator.  Furthermore, PewPartnership (2002) states “leaders must inspire commitment and action by catalyzing, convening, energizing, and facilitating others to create visions and solve problems” (n.p.).  In the overall application of a mentor, he, or she, can be viewed as an all-encompassing friend. 

 

            While I was active duty, the Air Force introduced me to a mentoring system.  I was assigned a sponsor whose role it was to ensure that I was prepared for my first station assignment after tech school.  His job was to ensure that I was transported from the airport to the base and that my arrangements for housing were already made.  He also familiarized me with the base, surrounding area, and unwritten rules and courtesies observed at Offutt AFB.  He was also a peer of mine and helped me get up to speed with the system we maintained.  He explained the purpose of the Military Air Space Management System (MASMS) and how we supported the national defense efforts of the United States.  We formed a friendship and it was a huge help for a single airman to have someone to confer with after arriving at a new base and not being very familiar with military life.  Just having someone available to hear my concerns and help me adjust to being on my own for the first time was a great benefit to my success in my flight, squadron, and group.  The listening skills of my sponsor, supervisors, and friends helped me get through the rough, stressful times associated with major life changes.  These people were true leaders, who possessed most, if not all, of the basic traits of a leader.

 

            Whereas a mentor has no specific focus within the relationship, a trainer’s primary focus is the teacher/student relationship.  A trainer typically focuses on the product, process, and procedures defined within the scope of the organization.  A trainer should also possess knowledge above and beyond the level of knowledge of the pupils.  In this respect, the trainer is viewed as a leader, or a teacher.  Think of a third grade teacher.  She, or he, must be able to motivate the students in her, or his, class; convey the appropriate information to educate them with history, the basics of mathematics, English, and science.  In order for a teacher to captivate the audience of nine year olds, she, or he, must be able to exude an atmosphere of excitement and enthusiasm.  The children respond better with praises of their accomplishments and redirections and corrections of their shortcomings.  If the teacher is not a leader, the children would be less likely to learn and the relationship would not be as fruitful.

 

            Another purpose of training is to advance within the organization and/or to another organization assuming a higher role than the current one held.  In order to receive this training, it is necessary for others with more experience, more familiarization, or more interaction with the products to share their knowledge with the less familiar coworkers.  The organization may also provide the means for the employees to attend formal classes through vendors.  This situation is one of much controversy and discussion in many workplaces. 

 

Many people feel that if they share their knowledge, they will not retain their power as a superior, their status as a lead engineer, or their title as the residing expert on a certain subject.  These types of people do not consider the possibilities that they may be replaced at one point or another.  They do not consider that their lack of information sharing is ultimately detrimental to the accomplishment of the long term organizational goals.  The oxymoron with this situation is that true leaders share their knowledge and experiences because they possess the true traits of a leader and they want to help others succeed, as well as trying to help the organization succeed in its visions and goals for future endeavors.

 

References:

 

Bisoux, T. (2002, September/October). The mind of a leader. BizEd.  Retrieved

August 13, 2004 from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/archives/Sep-Oct02/p26-31.pdf.

Clark, D. (1997). Leadership-character and traits. Retrieved August 13, 2004 from

http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadchr.html.

Dessler, G. (2004). Management: principles and practices for tomorrow’s leaders (3rd

ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Montesino, M. (2003, Summer). Leadership/followership similarities between people in a

developed and a developing country: The case of Dominicans in NYC and Dominicans on the island. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10. Retrieved December 14, 2003 from ProQuest database.

Moore, K. (2003, December). Changing corporate culture—one person at a time. Online

Newsletter.  Retrieved August 12, 2004 from Northrop Grumman Intranet.

Northrop Grumman Corporation. (2003). Vision values behaviors.  Brochure distributed

to employees.

PewPartnership. (2002). Collaborative leadership.  Retrieved August 13, 2004 from

http://www.pew-partnership.org/collableadership/collableadership.html.

Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice

Hall.

Shapiro, S. (1999). Listening for success. USA: Chica Publications.

Tallman, B. (2003, Fall). The organization leader as king, warrior, magician and lover:

How Jungian archetypes affect the way men lead organizations. Organizational

Development Journal, 21. Retrieved December 14, 203 from ProQuest database.

United States Small Business Administration. (n.d.). Leadership traits.  Retrieved August

13, 2004 from http://www.sba.gov/managing/leadership/traits.html.

Vandekerckhove, W. & Commers, M.S.R. (2003, June). Downward workplace mobbing:

A sign of the times? Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved December 14, 2003 from ProQuest database.

Weiss, J.W. (2003). Business ethics (3rd ed.). United States: Thomson South-Western.

Weymes, E. (2003, May). Relationships not leadership sustain successful organizations.

Journal of Change Management, 3. Retrieved December 14, 2003 from ProQuest database.

Whetton, D.A. & Cameron, K.S. (2002). Developing management skills (5th ed.). Upper

Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

 

 

Comments to: editor@leadingtoday.org

 

 

BACK TO weLEAD HOME PAGE

 

 

About the author:

 

Cicily Goreham was a member of the Untied States Air Force until 2000. Since them she has worked for Sterling Software/Northrop Grumman.  She has been a software engineer, software tester, and technical support engineer since joining the military in 1996. Cicily is presently completing her Bachelor’s degree at Bellevue University.