weLEAD Online Magazine
Copyright 2001 ã weLEAD, Inc.
I was preparing to
present a Sunday morning leadership seminar recently and someone from the
audience came up to me and asked a thought-provoking question. He quizzed me by
asking abruptly, “Where have all the leaders gone?” At first I was
puzzled so I asked him if he could expand on his question. His reply was
blunt. “Yes, he said, why don’t we have leaders in the world like we used
to?” After a brief discussion, he stated, ”I guess
since we don’t have leadership in the world anymore the only thing left is to
just talk about it!” His statements are a reflection of what many people
believe today. It seems to many that we don’t have the
quality or quantity of leaders today as we did in the past. Is
this really true?
To answer this question we must first ask and
answer another question, “Just what is a leader?” A common myth
is that leaders are individuals who are either powerful,
prominent, charismatic or have legions of followers. This is simply not true.
Yes, it is true that some individuals who have the above mentioned qualities
are leaders, but some of the most effective leaders do not have any of
them. Frankly, having served in various management positions for over 20 years
has taught me that many organizational CEO’s and presidents couldn’t lead a
group of people out of a well lit room! The perception of “where have all the
leaders gone” exists because the labels of “leader” or “leadership” are so
often misused and misapplied. The reality is that most leaders are not in
formal positions of power. A loose definition of the word “leader” can delude
you about leadership. For example,
we might say that a policeman can lead a prisoner to jail. In this case,
the policeman is not a leader but a captor. The policeman and prisoner
do not share the same goal. The policeman is demonstrating coercion and power, not
leadership. Real leaders almost never have a need to coerce or
intimidate others in order to accomplish a mission together. Leadership and
power are two entirely different terms. Some leaders do have formal
positions of power but the majority do not.
What effect has our
modern culture had on leadership? It has had a profound effect especially
within our western democracies. Allow me to provide an example in the arena of
political leadership. The basic framework of a democratic culture is a pride of
individualism and personal independence. Our powerful
electronic media also plays a significant role in how we react to or judge
those in leadership positions. Before World War II, leaders were primarily
respected by the media and were presented with a positive image in spite of
their flaws. Today, the reverse is true as the media now often focuses
on leaders flaws in order to promote a negative image. As a result, many
individuals are now more skeptical and resistant toward anyone
who attempts to offer new ideas or a new direction. Because of this deepening
rooted culture, leaders are not as respected or even acknowledged as they were
in the past. This is true not only in the political arena but in all areas of
leadership.
Indeed,
our democratic principles and media influence have had a powerful effect on
leadership in the last 50 years. In reality, most of us in the western world
don’t really seem to want ongoing leadership in our society! We feel
threatened or confined by others attempting to lead us to new paths or ideas.
If we are honest with ourselves, what we want is “leadership on demand”. We
want to be able to call on leaders during times of crisis and then watch
them ride off into the sunset when the crisis is over. We appear to want
leadership only when we want it and on our terms. At our
convenience, we now live in a civilization of instant coffee, instant
breakfast, and instant communication. We now expect instant leadership,
but apparently only at the times we want it.

Perhaps the most profound example of this
was at the end of World War II. Winston Churchill had demonstrated an
astounding example of leadership for the British people as prime minister. His
indomitable spirit and oratory excellence had inspired his people with a vision
of endurance and victory over the German empire. For a period of time, before
the United State entered the war, Churchill’s leadership galvanized the will of
the British people to stand alone against Nazi tyranny. Few would question
Churchill’s leadership abilities, especially at a time when they were needed
the most. Yet, what happened immediately after the war? In the first post-war
election of 1945 Churchill was removed as British prime minister as his
Conservative party gained only 213 seats in a Parliament of 640. Churchill was
the same leader he had always been! But the British people wanted to put
the war and its leader behind them. They no longer wanted his kind of
leadership after the war. Instead, they chose to support a Labour
platform of economic and social reform.
Another
reason there may appear to be a dearth of leadership today is
demonstrated by a “bumper sticker” I have seen. It states very clearly…”LEAD…
Follow…or get out of the way!” (Actually, it wasn’t put as nicely as I worded
it here). In order for anyone to lead, there must be followers. Leaders
and followers need each other. If there are no followers, or potential
followers don’t care, all the leadership skills that anyone can possibly exhibit, will be in vain. (I will discuss the important
qualities of followership in next months weLEAD article entitled, “Where have all the followers
gone?”) But, as the “bumper sticker” implies, there is an important third
category. It is neither leadership nor followership but that of the uncommitted
observer. This third category is a growing force in our modern
culture and makes leadership more difficult than ever before. The
observer is typically not interested in a mission or a vision, but in
maintaining a distance from leaders and followers. From a leadership
perspective, this detachment saps the potential creative resources and
ideas available from the observer. Often, their lack of support or commitment
may inadvertently create resistance against all efforts at leadership.
I
maintain that leadership is as available as ever. The real problem is
that followers are fewer and often less committed because
our modern western civilization has persuaded many to become uncommitted
observers. Some have also become observers because of negative past
experiences they witnessed when they attempted to follow a leader! What
does this mean for a leader? It means the leader must work harder than
ever before to inspire, motivate and encourage larger numbers of observers to
make a personal commitment and become followers. This can only be done when a
leader demonstrates integrity, self-sacrifice, dedication and respect for the
observer as well as their own followers. As author Garry Wills comments,
“Followers judge leaders. Only if the leaders pass that test do they have any
impact.” More than any time in history, the role of being a leader is more
complex and challenging.
Where have all the leaders gone? They haven’t really
gone anywhere. Many are still with us and a new generation of leaders has
accepted the torch from the past generation. However, the overwhelming
majority of them are not prominent individuals and you will not see them on the
evening news or read about them in the evening newspaper. But be assured of
this, every day a million random acts of leadership are demonstrated in our
homes, schools, shop floors, office buildings, government institutions,
community projects and religious organizations. Sadly, these accomplishments go
unnoticed and under-appreciated because of all the problems that also
exist in these same institutions and within our society. Most of these
individuals are not in positions of power or great influence. But within their
own environments, departments, groups or sectors they are working hard to
articulate a vision, and leading others to meet the organization’s needs
and their own follower’s needs.
Effective
leaders are still with us, facing greater resistance and more challenges
than ever. They are not gone, but are attempting to be agents of change in a
complex world that usually offers little recognition to them. Next month, we
will discuss the essential qualities of followership.
Comments
to: gthomas@leadingtoday.org
BACK TO weLEAD HOME PAGE
About the author:
Greg has an extensive thirty-five years experience in public
speaking and has spoken to hundreds of audiences worldwide. Greg has a Master
of Arts degree in Leadership from
Bellevue University, where he also has served as an adjunct professor teaching
courses in business management and leadership since 2002. His first book, 52 Leadership Tips
(That Will Change How You Lead Others) was published
in 2006 by WingSpan Press. His second book, Making
Life's Puzzle Pieces Fit was published in March 2009. Both are available at
amazon.com. Greg is also the president of Leadership
Excellence, Ltd and a Managing Partner of the Leadership Management
Institute. Leadership
Excellence, Ltd. effectively builds
individuals and organizations to reach their highest potential through enhanced
productivity and personal development using a number of proven programs. He is also the president and founder
of weLEAD Incorporated.
References:
O'Toole,
James. (1995). Leading Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers
Wills,
Garry, (1994).
Certain Trumpets – The Call of Leaders. NY: Simon
& Schuster