weLEAD Online Magazine
Copyright 2001 ã weLEAD,
Inc.
I was preparing to present a Sunday
morning leadership seminar recently and someone from the audience came up to me
and asked a thought-provoking question. He quizzed me by asking abruptly,
“Where have all the leaders gone?” At first I was puzzled so I asked him
if he could expand on his question. His reply was blunt. “Yes, he said,
why don’t we have leaders in the world like we used to?” After a
brief discussion, he stated, ”I guess since we don’t have leadership in the
world anymore the only thing left is to just talk about it!” His
statements are a reflection of what many people believe today. It seems to many
that we don’t have the quality or quantity of leaders today as we
did in the past. Is this really true?
To answer this question we must first ask and answer another
question, “Just what is a leader?” A common myth is that leaders are
individuals who are either powerful, prominent, charismatic or have legions of
followers. This is simply not true. Yes, it is true that some individuals who
have the above mentioned qualities are leaders, but some of the most effective
leaders do not have any of them. Frankly, having served in various
management positions for over 20 years has taught me that many organizational CEO’s
and presidents couldn’t lead a group of people out of a well lit room! The
perception of “where have all the leaders gone” exists because the labels of
“leader” or “leadership” are so often misused and misapplied. The reality is
that most leaders are not in formal positions of power. A loose
definition of the word “leader” can delude you about leadership. For example, we might say that a policeman can lead a prisoner to
jail. In this case, the policeman is not a leader but a captor. The
policeman and prisoner do not share the same goal. The policeman is
demonstrating coercion and power, not leadership. Real leaders almost
never have a need to coerce or intimidate others in order to accomplish a
mission together. Leadership and power are two entirely different terms.
Some leaders do have formal positions of power but the majority do not.
What effect has our modern culture
had on leadership? It has had a profound effect especially within our western
democracies. Allow me to provide an example in the arena of political
leadership. The basic framework of a democratic culture is a pride of individualism
and personal independence. Our powerful electronic media also
plays a significant role in how we react to or judge those in leadership
positions. Before World War II, leaders were primarily respected by the media
and were presented with a positive image in spite of their flaws. Today, the
reverse is true as the media now often focuses on leaders flaws in order
to promote a negative image. As a result, many individuals are now more skeptical
and resistant toward anyone who attempts to offer new ideas or a new
direction. Because of this deepening rooted culture, leaders are not as
respected or even acknowledged as they were in the past. This is true not only
in the political arena but in all areas of leadership.
Indeed,
our democratic principles and media influence have had a powerful effect on
leadership in the last 50 years. In reality, most of us in the western world
don’t really seem to want ongoing leadership in our society! We feel
threatened or confined by others attempting to lead us to new paths or ideas.
If we are honest with ourselves, what we want is “leadership on demand”. We
want to be able to call on leaders during times of crisis and then watch
them ride off into the sunset when the crisis is over. We appear to want
leadership only when we want it and on our terms. At our
convenience, we now live in a civilization of instant coffee, instant breakfast,
and instant communication. We now expect instant leadership, but
apparently only at the times we want it.

Perhaps the most profound example of this was at the
end of World War II. Winston Churchill had demonstrated an astounding example
of leadership for the British people as prime minister. His indomitable spirit
and oratory excellence had inspired his people with a vision of endurance and
victory over the German empire. For a period of time, before the United State
entered the war, Churchill’s leadership galvanized the will of the British
people to stand alone against Nazi tyranny. Few would question Churchill’s
leadership abilities, especially at a time when they were needed the most. Yet,
what happened immediately after the war? In the first post-war election of 1945
Churchill was removed as British prime minister as his Conservative party
gained only 213 seats in a Parliament of 640. Churchill was the same
leader he had always been! But the British people wanted to put the war and its
leader behind them. They no longer wanted his kind of leadership after
the war. Instead, they chose to support a Labour platform of economic and
social reform.
Another
reason there may appear to be a dearth of leadership today is
demonstrated by a “bumper sticker” I have seen. It states very clearly…”LEAD…
Follow…or get out of the way!” (Actually, it wasn’t put as nicely as I worded
it here). In order for anyone to lead, there must be followers. Leaders
and followers need each other. If there are no followers, or potential
followers don’t care, all the leadership skills that anyone can possibly
exhibit, will be in vain. (I will discuss the important qualities of
followership in next months weLEAD article entitled, “Where have all the
followers gone?”) But, as the “bumper sticker” implies, there is an important third
category. It is neither leadership nor followership but that of the uncommitted
observer. This third category is a growing force in our modern
culture and makes leadership more difficult than ever before. The
observer is typically not interested in a mission or a vision, but in
maintaining a distance from leaders and followers. From a leadership
perspective, this detachment saps the potential creative resources and
ideas available from the observer. Often, their lack of support or commitment
may inadvertently create resistance against all efforts at leadership.
I
maintain that leadership is as available as ever. The real problem is
that followers are fewer and often less committed because
our modern western civilization has persuaded many to become uncommitted
observers. Some have also become observers because of negative past
experiences they witnessed when they attempted to follow a leader! What
does this mean for a leader? It means the leader must work harder than
ever before to inspire, motivate and encourage larger numbers of observers to
make a personal commitment and become followers. This can only be done when a
leader demonstrates integrity, self-sacrifice, dedication and respect for the
observer as well as their own followers. As author Garry Wills comments,
“Followers judge leaders. Only if the leaders pass that test do they have any
impact.” More than any time in history, the role of being a leader is more
complex and challenging.
Where have all the leaders gone? They haven’t
really gone anywhere. Many are still with us and a new generation of leaders
has accepted the torch from the past generation. However, the
overwhelming majority of them are not prominent individuals and you will not
see them on the evening news or read about them in the evening newspaper. But
be assured of this, every day a million random acts of leadership are
demonstrated in our homes, schools, shop floors, office buildings, government
institutions, community projects and religious organizations. Sadly, these
accomplishments go unnoticed and under-appreciated because of all the problems
that also exist in these same institutions and within our
society. Most of these individuals are not in positions of power or great influence.
But within their own environments, departments, groups or sectors they are
working hard to articulate a vision, and leading others to meet the
organization’s needs and their own follower’s needs.
Effective
leaders are still with us, facing greater resistance and more challenges
than ever. They are not gone, but are attempting to be agents of change in a
complex world that usually offers little recognition to them. Next month, we
will discuss the essential qualities of followership.
Comments
to: gthomas@leadingtoday.org
BACK TO weLEAD HOME PAGE
About
the author:
Greg has over 25
years of sales and marketing experience within the electrical manufacturing
industry. Some of his positions have included being a National Sales Manager,
National Marketing Manager and Regional Sales Manager. He also has an extensive 35 years experience
in public speaking and has written articles for various publications. Greg has
a Master of Arts degree in Leadership from Bellevue University, where he has
served as an adjunct professor. He is the founder of weLEAD Incorporated, a
nonprofit organization chartered to promote personal and organizational
leadership. Greg's personal site is located at http://www.greglthomas.info
References:
O'Toole,
James. (1995). Leading Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
Wills,
Garry, (1994). Certain Trumpets – The Call of Leaders. NY: Simon & Schuster